We invite you to post your contributions directly onto the forums.
Dear members,
Please find below the contribution from C. Ravichandran from India.
Thank you for your contribution!
Alastair
e-Forum Facilitator
The following interventions are effective use to sexual minorities’ access to health services:
a. Awareness Generation
Posters and wall writings
One to one
Mass awareness
Street theater
Exhibition
Audio/Visual shows
Insist ABC methodology
b. Behaviour change communications
Condom demonstration
Condom distribution
c. Counseling
Counseling to all cases
Keeping confident on counseling
Referral to clinics
Referral to ICTC
d. Advocacy
e. Selection and Train the peer educator among the risk behaviour groups.
f. Care and support
Home based treatment
Hospital based treatment
Supply of medicines & nutrients periodically
Economic income generation activities to the family members of the infected person.
g. Improve the service providers quality regarding home based treatment.
The following challenges are existing for programmes for sexual minorities:
- Peer educators themselves do not like to use condoms with their regular partner.
- PEs not able to convince their peer groups about the importance of reducing the number of sexual partner.
- Peers do not like to practice non penetrative sex.
- PEs who keep IEC materials with them to train peers find it difficult. This is because of lack of private space and to keep their families away from their life style.
- Peers do not accept advice given by the peer educators. Peers think that PEs do not have more knowledge as they were also like them till recently.
- Peers do not inform their PEs about their STI symptoms.
- Peers do not like to take treatment from Health care providers trained in syndromic case management.
- Some health care providers do not cooperate with the peer educators whey they refer their peers.
- Peers want the PEs to accompany them for treatment.
- Peers are not confident that the doctors will maintain confidentiality about their symptoms.
- PEs find difficulties to motivate their peers to go for periodic check ups, especially if they are asymptomatic.
- Peers believe that symptoms of STIs are not serious and therefore do not require treatment.
- PEs not able to motivate their peers for partner treatment.
- PEs hesitate to keep penis model and condom at home because of fear of being reprimanded or being identified as having multi partner sex.
- Lack of privacy in the field for condom demonstration especially for street based sex workers.
- Some PEs do not talk to their peers seriously because they themselves do not use condoms consistly.
- It take a long time to motivate peers to go for counseling. A large number of PEs therefore get burnt out and do not continue to motivate them.
- Peers often refuse to go to the ICTC because of distance.
- Peers are afraid that their high risk behaviours will be known to others and so refuse counseling.
- Family members of PEs do not allow them to interact with their peers. This is especially true for adolescents in the urban slum.
- PEs are not able to maintain confidentiality. Some times they quote other peers as an example to motivate resistant peers.
- High dropout rate of peer educators and the resultant inadequacy in number of trained PEs in proportion to target groups.
- Pes may limit their interaction with the peer groups to mere transfer of information but not for supporting behaviour change.