EspañolFrançaisРусский
   
 
 
   
 
 
in
 
   
Page 6 of 6 (87 items) « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6
Sort Posts:

08-19-2008 6:56 PM

Re: Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

Though I have actually said something in that respect, your response, Mr. Ali, is actually more reason why BCC activties should be focused on men. Let the men be taught how to use condoms and be comfortable with using condoms. Even if they will not be using them regularly, at least with massive BCC activities focused on them, we will come to a situation where they will not resist demands for condom use from their partners. So I still strongly suggest that efforts should not skewed in favour of just women but each should have a startegy tailor made and focused on each gender.

08-19-2008 6:35 PM

Re: Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

Whenever we hear the word "gender" in the context of public health development work, what most of the time comes to mind is the female gender. And it is very interesting how the question was coined. Women are the majority that are on ARVs but should interventions be focused on men? Or may be is the question form the perspective that more men should be encouraged to come forward for testing for subsequent placement on treatment and care/ Whatever the case may be, I will advocate that there should tailor-made strategies targeted at each gender. For example, prevention startegies should be targeted more at the men, especially as it concerns something like condom use since women will be protected if men are made to feel very comfortable using condoms. There is a very serious need for massive BCC activities targeted at men while we wait for a microbicide that can be used by women to protect themselves.

08-19-2008 10:58 AM



  • cotienoo
  • Top 500 Contributor
  • Kenya
    Not currently affiliated with the Global Fund
  • Posts 3

Re: Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

Dear all,

It is important to involve men in any strategic interventions. Various reports on the epidemic indicate the increasing proportions of infections among the married and a continued sustained increase among young women, especially ages 20-24. Evidence presented in 2008 UNAIDS report on the epidemic indicates a direct relationship between the reduction in the number of sexual partners and the reduction in new infections.
 
The gender equity strategy should therefore aim to promote values that enhance the dignity of married couples, who should respect one another and restrain from multiple sexual relationships. This is the strategy that could actually bring down the spread of the epidemic. If men and women are empowered to avoid infecting their partners, then the world could witness a turn around in the direction the epidemic seems to be taking.

08-19-2008 10:07 AM

Re: Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

The issue of women having slightly more than 50% being on ARVs need to be looked at in context. In a lot of set ups the girls and women have three times more HIV prevalence than thier male counter parts. The reasons for this disparity are varied with some being gender related like the issue of wife inheritance, early forced marriages over and above the obvious biological differences. In some parts of the world if one has two children, a boy and a girl, if there are competing health needs the boy is likely to be given what it takes to get well at the expence of the girl. I strongly feel that women and girls are still a group of vulnerable beings in society and should be assisted by a deliberate policy thst favours increasing access to them. In many societies the women and girls do not take the critical decisions on when to access the health services and have to be allowed to take certain actions by the males who dominate the societies. It is therefore imperative that deliberate policies be in place to enhance access to health services by women and girls.

08-19-2008 9:16 AM

Re: Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

In this situation the focus of attention should be independent of gender. The importance should be of the need. It should not be that a less needy women gets more share of the benefits as compared to a needy man.The criterion of need should also be well defined , objective & easily measurable/quantifiable. It should not allow undesirable subjectivity at the grassroot level i.e. ignoring needy persons because of personal biases. As regards benefits to women are concerned there should be more study on the kind of benefits required.
Tag(s):

08-18-2008 9:48 PM

Re: Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

 

Dear E forum members

According to (UNAIDS) report around 50% of HIV/AIDS adults in the world and 98 percent of these women live in developing countries.

Biologically women are twice more likely to become infected with HIV through unprotected heterosexual intercourse than men. Women are also less likely to be able to negotiate condom use and are more likely to be subjected to non-consensual sex. Together, these issues increase a woman’s risk of being infected with HIV through heterosexual transmission.

Due to these reasons, and because women in majority of developing countries don't have any access to the proper information on HIV/AIDS transmission and prevention, we should concentrate more efforts to disseminate the information to the female population, especially in developing countries. They should have the skills of negotiations and means of protection. By that we can promote the gender equity and protect vulnerable population from acquiring infection

Ali As'ad

Friends of GF MENA

08-18-2008 6:21 PM



  • daniely
  • Top 500 Contributor
  • Nigeria
    Not currently affiliated with the Global Fund
  • Posts 2

Re: Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

Regards the Gender strategy focus as backed by the 2008 statistics, I have my view to read as thus:
The fact that the statistics availed that women had a higher %, istill strongly believe and suggest that the focus must not be totaly shifted to men, rather a concerted and intergating sort of approach be adopted. i.e carrying the two sects both men and women along but with more concentration on men.
 
Alot of men still dont go openly for testing not to talk of placing them on ART. As such there statistics is not captured.
 
A lot of men especially in Africa keep or maitain more than one wife.If the men are neglected, the effect in the long run will be  and have multiplier effect.So the earlier the better, focus be placed on men who act as agent of spread.
 
Daniel Yerima
Tag(s):

08-18-2008 6:11 PM



  • DARAMY
  • Not Ranked
  • Sierra Leone
    Local Fund Agent (LFA)
  • Posts 1

Re: Week 1: Gender Statold us in the tegy focus

I will want men to be considered this time.Becginingause it is from men that men meet there needs as God in the be
Tag(s):

08-18-2008 5:52 PM

Re: Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

Dear GF I think antiretroviral treatment concentrating to women is a right and good strategy. For men I agree we use strategy social marketing in order to behaviour changes (BC). This is an important policy because direct to encourage of behaviour. That's a long run policy but nevermine, we must make it. In Indonesia case, BC is very strategic policy becauce I think man is very easy to immitate and then follow distortion mind. Warm Regards, Abraham FanggidaE

08-18-2008 5:00 PM



  • konjit
  • Top 50 Contributor
  • Ethiopia
    Not currently affiliated with the Global Fund
  • Posts 12

Re: Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

I am so pleased to read that the GF is working on a "gender equity strategy". This is so important as women are incresingly becoming infected and affected by HIV and AIDS and there is so little is being done in addressing women vulnerabilities to HIV at the community level.
For this initiative , I would like to appreciate the efforts and initiative of the GF in addressing gender issues. I believe the strategy should focus not only on women and girls, but also on men and boys systematically. It should be a comprehensive strategy that address women and girls vulnerabilities to HIV with addressing the issues of men and the contribution of both sexes in the prevention of HIV.
 
Although the number of women affected and infected by HIV and AIDS is increasing globally,the involvement of men and boys in the interventions as well is important. The social and economic factors that are making women vulnerable to HIV, which of course does not exclude biological and political factors, shows that strategies focusing only on girls and women will not bring about sustainable change on women and girls empowerment. The need of targeting men and boys help us in changing societal norms and values which are contributing to the gender division of labor and gender stereotypes, all linked to lack of economic, social and political empowerment of women, which factors on women and girls more affected and infected by HIV/AIDS.
 
The strategy of addressing women and girls and men and boys should of course differ. In HIV prevention, care and support and AIDS treatment the role of women and girls is changing rapidly as well as the impact on men and women differs. For instance, women and girls due to low social and economic status in the community as well as to harmful traditional practices are more vulnerable to HIV and are stigmatised based on their sex and HIV status which inclused Gender based violence, carry the burden of care and support at the family and community level. Women who work as sex workers are not able to protect themselves from HIV, not able to negotiate condom use and their human rights abused. When we see HIV prevention services, among others there is a lack of female controlled method like the female condom and lack of women negotiation skills in condom usage. Factors like GBV (Gender Based Violence) prevent women from accessing PMTCT and ART services. For the girl child, female genital mutiliation, early marriage, wife inheritance, poverty, gender division of labor and other factors prevent her from education and increase vulnerability to HIV.
 
What I have pointed out are some of the issues which should be considered in the strategy formulation, to be seen as a background and help us in getting us a strategy that address women and girls issues as well as men and boys issues as well. I believe addressing the issues of gender division of labor, women empowerment need the involvment and particpation of men and boys. The need to address women vulnerablitiies to HIV, needs the changed perception and involvment of the community, which of course means including men. For men the strategy needs to be focused on issues, such as socieltal strctural change, the need to recongnize and value women work at the family level, the need to change the gender division of labor and other issues that will bring sustainable change at the family and community level.

08-18-2008 4:28 PM



  • Tommy
  • Not Ranked
  • South Africa
    Not currently affiliated with the Global Fund
  • Posts 1

Re: Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

Dear All It would be one of the biggest mistakes if we apply the gender strategy.The whole world does not consists of only the one race or gender therefore the strategy should focuson everybody male,female and children across the board.

08-18-2008 2:38 PM



  • Info
  • Top 10 Contributor
  • Switzerland
    Global Fund Secretariat
  • Posts 685

Week 1: Gender Stategy focus

With the majority of people on antiretroviral treatment being women (56% at the end of 2007*), should the Global Fund’s gender strategy focus more on men rather than concentrating on women and girls?
 
(This question is also available in: EspañolFrançais - Русский)

In April, this e-Forum started with discussions on the topic of “gender”. At the time, the Global Fund was preparing to develop a Gender Strategy and, in a linked process, a Strategy on Sexual Minorities, that would guide how the Global Fund addresses gender inequalities in country programming and in the technical review of proposals.

The comments made by you, the e-Forum participants, have provided valuable input into this strategy process. Other consultations have taken place between April and now, involving a broad range of stakeholders at the country and global levels. As a result, a first draft of the “Gender Equity Strategy” will be available shortly. It will be reviewed by the Policy and Strategy Committee of the Global Fund Board in September, and discussed by the Board itself in November.

Next week, we will share this draft with you, the e-Forum participants who were among the first group of stakeholders to contribute to its development, and ask you for your comments, before finalizing the document for submission to the Global Fund decision-making bodies.

Before that, though, we would like to ask you the above question that stems from comments heard at the recent International AIDS Conference in Mexico City.

Reference material

Page 6 of 6 (87 items) « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6
© 2002 - 2008 The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. About this site | Legal